They’re Not Connecting Us. They’re Keeping Us Fighting.
Why many social networks reward conflict over conversation—and why we don’t have to play along.
The Internet Was Supposed to Bring Us Together
One of the original promises of social media was remarkably optimistic.
People from different countries would meet. Ideas would flow freely. Communities would form around shared interests rather than geography. Knowledge would spread faster than ever before. Humanity, connected by technology, would become more understanding and more collaborative.
Some of that happened.
But another force quietly emerged alongside it.
Instead of simply connecting people, many platforms discovered that conflict was incredibly profitable.
Not because they wanted society to become more divided.
Because division reliably captures attention.
This space is built for people who care about the future—not just the shiny version, but the human one. If that sounds like you, consider upgrading to a paid subscription. You’ll be helping to keep independent thinking alive and unfiltered.
Outrage Is a Business Model
Social networks do not sell content.
They sell attention.
Every additional minute you spend scrolling becomes another opportunity to display advertisements, recommend content, collect behavioral data, and keep you inside their ecosystem. From that perspective, the most valuable content is not necessarily the most informative, thoughtful, or constructive.
It is the content that keeps you from putting your phone down.
Outrage happens to be exceptionally good at this.
When we see something that makes us angry, our brains treat it as important. We read the comments. We reply. We argue. We share it with friends. We return later to see what happened next. A disagreement that might have lasted five minutes in real life can occupy days online.
Conflict creates engagement.
Engagement creates revenue.
That is an uncomfortable incentive structure.
Tribes Are Easier to Monetize Than Individuals
Humans naturally form groups.
That tendency long predates the internet. Families, neighborhoods, religions, professions, political movements, sports teams, and cultural identities have always shaped how we see the world. Belonging is part of being human.
Social media did not invent tribes.
It accelerated them.
Algorithms quickly learned that people engage more intensely when content reinforces identity. The moment we stop being individuals with nuanced opinions and become members of opposing teams, every discussion begins to resemble a competition. Complex issues become simplified into “us” versus “them.” Curiosity gives way to certainty. Understanding gives way to victory.
The stronger the tribal identity becomes, the more emotionally invested people become in defending it.
That emotional investment translates directly into attention.
The Algorithm Doesn’t Care Who Wins
One of the most interesting aspects of engagement algorithms is that they are largely indifferent to the substance of the argument.
The algorithm is not asking whether a conversation improves understanding.
It is asking whether people continue interacting.
Agreement produces a few comments.
Outrage produces thousands.
Thoughtful nuance rarely goes viral.
Conflict often does.
The system is not necessarily trying to make society worse.
It is simply optimizing for a metric that is poorly aligned with human flourishing.
When engagement becomes the primary objective, division often becomes an unintended but predictable outcome.
AI Could Make This Better—or Much Worse
Artificial intelligence is making recommendation systems even more sophisticated.
Algorithms increasingly understand not only what captures our attention, but what emotions keep us engaged the longest. They can personalize outrage just as effectively as they personalize entertainment. Left unchecked, this could create feeds that become increasingly effective at reinforcing our existing beliefs while continuously presenting content designed to provoke emotional reactions.
That possibility should concern us.
Fortunately, AI also offers another path.
The same technology could expose us to thoughtful opposing viewpoints instead of inflammatory ones. It could encourage curiosity instead of certainty. It could identify common ground instead of maximizing disagreement. It could optimize for understanding rather than engagement.
The technology is capable of both.
The choice lies in what we decide to optimize.
Refuse to Become the Product
Perhaps the most powerful response is surprisingly simple.
Stop rewarding the behavior.
Do not share every outrage.
Do not amplify every manufactured controversy.
Do not mistake emotional activation for meaningful participation.
Choose conversations that increase understanding rather than merely increasing volume.
Support creators who educate rather than inflame.
Reward platforms and communities that encourage curiosity instead of constant conflict.
Attention is one of the few resources we completely control.
Every click is a vote for the kind of internet we want to build.
Build Bridges Instead of Barricades
The internet has given humanity an unprecedented ability to communicate across cultures, professions, generations, and continents. That opportunity is too valuable to surrender to algorithms that profit from keeping us divided. We do not have to become members of permanently warring digital tribes simply because those interactions generate more engagement.
The healthiest communities have never been built on perpetual conflict.
They are built on curiosity, generosity, disagreement without contempt, and the belief that another person might know something we do not. Those qualities are quieter than outrage, which is precisely why they receive less algorithmic attention. Yet they are also the qualities that allow trust, innovation, and civilization itself to flourish.
The next time your feed tries to convince you that another tribe is your enemy, pause for a moment.
Ask yourself who benefits from your outrage.
It probably isn’t you.
This space is built for people who care about the future—not just the shiny version, but the human one. If that sounds like you, consider upgrading to a paid subscription. You’ll be helping to keep independent thinking alive and unfiltered.
AI is cool, but what if you could actually use it as your life coach?
That’s what 10xYOU is all about—turning AI into extra income, more focus, and healthier habits. It’s like thinkfuture’s practical twin—same curiosity, but built for action.
Check out our 10xYOU publications:
Money Monday with Ben Caldwell: Your AI Money Coach
Start your week with smart, stress-free money moves. Every Monday, Ben shares one actionable way to use AI to save, earn, or invest better. No fluff, no jargon—just practical steps you can use right away to make your money work harder for you.
Workflow Wednesday with Nik Harper: Your AI Productivity Coach
Every Wednesday, Nik shows you how to work smarter, not harder. From AI-powered tricks to practical workflow shifts, she’ll help you save time, cut stress, and actually enjoy your week. Quick reads, easy experiments, real results.
Fulfilment Friday with Leo Serrano: Your AI Wellness Coach
Fridays aren’t just the end of the week—they’re a reset. In Fulfillment Friday, Leo blends espresso-fueled storytelling, Nonna’s wisdom, and AI guidance to help you recharge and find balance. Each issue delivers a personal story, practical wellness strategies, and one simple “Friday Reset” challenge you can actually use before Monday.
Great post. The algorithm does t care who wins 💯! The rage bait is real, they just want to keep you on the platform. Honestly the best advice and biggest rebellion is what you’re saying here: refuse to engage in that garbage.